Summary
Legal betting on U.S. election outcomes has recently been authorized following a federal appeals court ruling that overturned a ban imposed by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This decision allows the prediction market Kalshi to offer contracts related to various election outcomes, including the presidential race and congressional control, marking a significant shift in the landscape of political wagering in the United States.
The court’s ruling came after a lengthy legal battle initiated by Kalshi, which argued that the CFTC’s prohibition on election betting overstepped its regulatory authority. The appeals court found that the CFTC failed to demonstrate that allowing such betting would harm the public interest or the integrity of elections. As a result, Kalshi has resumed its operations, offering contracts on key political events, including which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the upcoming elections. The platform’s reentry into the election betting market has drawn attention, with over $100 million already wagered on various election outcomes. This development raises questions about the implications of legal betting on public perception of election integrity and the potential for influencing voter behavior.
Background of the Legal Dispute
Kalshi, a derivatives trading platform, sought to list contracts allowing Americans to bet on election outcomes, but the CFTC blocked these contracts, citing concerns over election integrity and potential unlawful gaming. In response, Kalshi filed a lawsuit asserting that the CFTC had exceeded its authority. A federal district court initially sided with Kalshi, enabling it to offer betting contracts, but the CFTC quickly appealed the decision, seeking to maintain its ban.
Court Rulings and Implications
On October 2, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the lower court’s ruling, stating that the CFTC had not provided sufficient evidence of potential harm from the betting contracts. The appeals court emphasized the importance of ensuring election integrity but concluded that the CFTC’s concerns were not substantiated. This ruling allows Kalshi to operate its betting markets as the presidential election approaches, with contracts already available for betting on various outcomes, including the presidential race between candidates like Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
Market Response and Future Prospects
Following the court’s decision, Kalshi has expanded its offerings significantly, listing numerous contracts related to the upcoming elections. The platform has reported substantial interest, with millions wagered on political outcomes within days of resuming operations. The ruling not only opens the door for Kalshi but also sets a precedent that may encourage other firms to explore similar markets. However, the CFTC has indicated its intention to appeal the decision, suggesting that the legal battle over election betting in the U.S. may continue, with potential regulatory changes on the horizon.
Concerns Over Election Integrity
Despite the excitement surrounding legal election betting, concerns remain regarding its impact on the electoral process. Critics argue that allowing financial speculation on election outcomes could undermine public trust in the democratic process and lead to perceptions of corruption or manipulation. The CFTC has expressed worries that betting might incentivize voters to act in ways that could distort election results, although the court found these claims unproven at this time. As the election approaches, the ongoing discourse around the implications of election betting will likely intensify, influencing both public opinion and regulatory actions.
As voters cast ballots this election, some Americans are placing bets
Oct. 30 / Wcvb / Provides a snapshot of the new landscape of election betting in the U.S., noting over $100 million wagered. It captures Donald Trump's reaction to betting trends, linking them to public perception and polling. “ While gamblers outside of the United States have long been able to place bets on who will win the White House, in a historic shift this election cycle,...
Kalshi goes 'full throttle on election betting' for presidential, Senate races, CFTC complains
Oct. 9 / Cnbc / Kalshi's legal battle is framed within the broader context of election integrity and market speculation. The article offers historical insights into political betting, grounding the current situation in a rich narrative. “ The Commodity Futures Trading Commission headquarters in Washington, DC, U.S. Ting Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images KalshiEx has listed more than two dozen...
Americans are able to bet on the US elections again after a legal fight
Oct. 3 / Insider / Highlights the legal victory for Kalshi, enabling Americans to bet on elections. It contrasts Kalshi with other platforms, providing context on regulatory challenges and the evolving landscape of political betting. “ Americans can bet on the outcome of US elections following a legal fight. Last month, Kalshi briefly listed bets on congressional election outcomes before...
Oct. 4 / Benzinga / Reports on Kalshi's rapid expansion of political betting options following court approval. It includes CEO insights on market demand and the regulatory pushback from the CFTC, emphasizing the ongoing legal tensions. “ On Wednesday, October 3rd, U.S. markets closed lower as investors braced for the September payrolls report, which could influence future interest rate...
Betting on the election will soon be legal in US after massive court ruling
Oct. 3 / Independent / Explores the implications of a federal appeals court ruling that allows betting on congressional elections. It highlights Kalshi's unique position in the market and the potential for future expansion. “ Betting on the outcome of US congressional elections may now be legal thanks to a Wednesday federal appeals court ruling. The Commodities Futures Trading...
Court ruling opens floodgates for legal United States election betting
Oct. 2 / New York Post / Legal gambling on elections is officially greenlit as the D.C. Circuit Court denies the CFTC's request to halt Kalshi. Offers a concise overview of the legal battle and its implications for the upcoming elections. “ Legal gambling on the presidential election and Congressional races got the greenlight Wednesday — and betting could start as soon as this week. The Court of...
US federal court upholds ruling letting KalshiEX list election betting contracts
Oct. 2 / Gazette / Examines the CFTC's efforts to regulate election betting and Kalshi's response. It emphasizes the legal and ethical debates surrounding election integrity, making it a thought-provoking read on the topic. “ By Laura Matthews WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld a lower court's order that permitted New York derivatives trading...
Oct. 3 / Benzinga / In a significant legal development, Kalshi resumes betting on congressional elections after a court ruling. Highlights the CFTC's failed motion to block operations and includes insights from Kalshi's founder. “ In a landmark development, prediction market Kalshi resumed taking bets on the outcome of the congressional elections after an appeals court lifted a ban on...
Oct. 3 / Benzinga / A detailed account of Kalshi's legal victory and its implications for election integrity. It discusses the CFTC's concerns while providing a balanced view on the potential for political betting markets. “ In a landmark development, prediction market Kalshi resumed taking bets on the outcome of the congressional elections after an appeals court lifted a ban on...
US appeals court clears Kalshi to restart elections betting
Oct. 2 / Gazette / Summarizes the appeals court ruling that permits Kalshi to offer election betting. It captures the tension between regulatory authority and market innovation, appealing to those interested in financial and legal dynamics. “ By Laura Matthews WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld a lower court's order that permitted New York derivatives trading...