Summary
Elon Musk’s social media platform, X (formerly Twitter), had its appeal denied by the Supreme Court regarding special counsel Jack Smith’s request for former President Donald Trump’s Twitter records. The denial means that Smith can access these records without notifying Trump, which is part of an investigation into alleged interference in the 2020 presidential election.
The case arose after Smith’s team obtained a warrant in January 2023 to seize Trump’s records without prior notification, arguing that revealing such a seizure could lead to the destruction of evidence. X’s legal team contended that Trump’s presidential role should have afforded him the opportunity to protect his records. Despite already complying with the warrant and facing a fine of $350,000 for resistance, Musk’s appeal aimed to prevent similar future actions that bypass notification of the individual involved. This ruling highlights ongoing legal tensions surrounding the intersection of social media, privacy rights, and governmental investigations.
Elon Musk's X appeal denied by Supreme Court over Trump criminal investigation
Oct. 7 / Raw Story / Highlights the Supreme Court's decision on Musk's appeal, providing detailed context on the legal implications for Trump's records. Its reliance on NBC News lends credibility, though it could benefit from more diverse sources. “ An appeal brought by Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter) social media platform over special counsel Jack Smith's request for former President Donald Trump's...
Jack Smith's Toughest Challenge in Prosecuting Donald Trump
Oct. 9 / Newsweek / Explores the complexities facing Jack Smith in prosecuting Trump, emphasizing the challenges of proving private communications. The insights from legal analysts add depth, though the lack of a clear author may weaken authority. “ Chief prosecutor will have a difficult talk convincing a judge that 's communication with was private, a legal analyst has told . Stephen Gillers, a law...