Convention of States Project: A Conservative Initiative for Constitutional Change

The Convention of States Project is rooted in Article V of the Constitution, which outlines two methods for proposing amendments: one through Congress and the other through a convention called by two-thirds of the states. This second method has never been utilized, making it a controversial and high-stakes endeavor. Advocates, including Texas billionaire Tim Dunn, view it as a pathway to enact significant changes, such as reversing progressive policies and reinforcing a Christian national identity in governance. Dunn has indicated that the initiative could serve as a catalyst for a broader spiritual and political revival in the United States. Critics, however, express concern over the potential for radical changes to the Constitution and the implications of such a convention, given that there are no restrictions on the scope of amendments that could be proposed.

Goals of the Convention of States Project

• Limit Federal Power: Supporters aim to reduce the size and influence of the federal government, viewing it as overreaching in its authority.
• Address Specific Issues: The project seeks to tackle various topics, including fiscal responsibility, term limits for Congress members, and the regulation of federal powers.

Key Figures and Support

Tim Dunn and other prominent conservative donors have been instrumental in funding and promoting the Convention of States Project. These figures argue that a convention could restore constitutional principles that they believe have been undermined over time. Dunn has publicly stated that the initiative is part of a larger strategy to reclaim America’s governance for what they consider its original Christian foundations.

Risks and Concerns

The potential for a constitutional convention raises significant concerns among legal scholars and political analysts. Critics argue that once convened, a convention could propose amendments that fundamentally alter the Constitution in unpredictable ways. The lack of limitations on the topics that can be discussed during such a convention adds to the apprehension surrounding this initiative, as it could lead to sweeping changes that impact civil rights and liberties.