Summary
The re-institution of Schedule F refers to a proposed policy that would allow a future Trump administration to reclassify thousands of federal employees, making it easier to fire them and replace them with political appointees. This policy aims to identify and remove civil servants deemed “nonperforming,” significantly altering the landscape of federal employment and potentially leading to mass firings.
The concept of Schedule F was first introduced by former President Trump in 2020, allowing his administration to bypass traditional civil service protections for federal workers. The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 blueprint advocates for reinstating this policy, which could affect as many as 50,000 career civil servants. Critics argue that this move would undermine the integrity of the federal workforce, as it opens the door for political loyalty to supersede merit-based employment. The proposal has garnered significant attention, as it aligns with broader conservative goals of reshaping government operations and reducing the influence of established civil service norms.
Implications of Schedule F
-
Potential for Mass Firings: The reintroduction of Schedule F could lead to widespread job insecurity among federal employees, who may be replaced based on political alignment rather than job performance.
-
Impact on Governance: Critics warn that this policy could politicize the federal workforce, making it more challenging to implement nonpartisan governance and maintain institutional knowledge.
Historical Context
The original implementation of Schedule F was met with significant backlash, as it aimed to classify a broad range of civil service positions as “at-will,” effectively stripping employees of their job protections. This controversial move was perceived as an attempt to consolidate political power within the executive branch, raising concerns about the implications for democratic governance and accountability.
Current Developments
Recent reports indicate that the Heritage Foundation is actively pursuing this agenda through its Oversight Project, which has filed thousands of Freedom of Information Act requests to identify federal employees who may not align with conservative values. This strategy is seen as a preparatory step for a potential second Trump administration, emphasizing the urgency and seriousness of the proposed changes to federal employment practices.
Donald Trump Says Project 2025 Author 'Coming on Board' If Elected
Oct. 9 / Newsweek “ Republican presidential candidate has said he would bring Tom Homan, a Project 2025 contributor, into his administration if he wins November's election. In a...
Project 2025 Offers A False Choice: Climate Action Vs. Economic Growth
Oct. 2 / Forbes / Forbes critiques Project 2025's environmental policies, emphasizing the false dichotomy between economic growth and climate action. It provides compelling data on the success of EPA regulations, making a strong case. “ Cancelling Project 2025 concept background with Typography under the US flag. Stopping 2025 project ... [+] political backdrop When Project 2025, the...
Think tank floods feds with public info requests — eyeing possible Trump-era purge
Oct. 1 / Raw Story / Raw Story emphasizes Project 2025's unpopularity, comparing it unfavorably to socialism. The polling data presented effectively frames the plan as a significant burden for Trump and the Republican Party. “ By Sharon Lerner and Andy Kroll ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like...
The Heritage Foundation Is Spamming the Government With Thousands of FOIAs
Oct. 2 / Gizmodo / The extensive FOIA requests from the Heritage Foundation signal a troubling strategy to identify and purge federal employees. This piece offers a critical look at the implications for civil service integrity and governance. “ The Heritage Foundation, the rightwing think tank behind Project 2025 , is spamming the federal government with thousands of Freedom of Information Act...
Kagro in the Morning podcast (AUDIO): Wednesday, October 2, 2024
Oct. 2 / Dailykos / Newsweek reports on Trump's commitment to Project 2025 contributors, linking past administration officials to future plans. It effectively underscores the continuity of controversial policies in a potential second term. “ x YouTube Video Listen to our archived episodes: Pandora | LibSyn | YouTube Support the show: Patreon | PayPal: 1x or monthly | Square Cash * It’s...
Oct. 1 / Propublica / ProPublica's investigative piece delves into the Heritage Foundation's extensive FOIA requests, revealing alarming tactics aimed at targeting federal employees. It highlights potential intimidation and political motivations. “ Three investigators for the Heritage Foundation have deluged federal agencies with thousands of Freedom of Information Act requests over the past year,...
Here are 11 times Trump obeyed the extremist group behind Project 2025
Sep. 29 / Dailykos / Daily Kos presents a thorough analysis linking Trump to the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, detailing past policy alignments. It offers a critical perspective on the administration's far-right agenda. “ Former President Donald Trump denies ties to the extremist government blueprint known as Project 2025 , a policy road map for a second Trump administration...
Heritage flips script on fired director of Project 2025 after 'disconcerting' revelations surface
Sep. 27 / Fox News / Heritage Foundation's internal turmoil over Project 2025 is laid bare, revealing workplace misconduct as a key issue. The article captures the fallout and implications for the conservative agenda effectively. “ The Heritage Foundation's Kevin Roberts explains what Project 2025 stands for as former President Trump distances himself from the conservative blueprint on...
Sep. 25 / Pr Newswire / Polling data on Black voters emphasizes the political stakes surrounding climate action and Project 2025. This report connects environmental policy to electoral outcomes, underscoring its importance in the campaign. “ New poll of Black voters across battleground states finds that 1 in 3 Black voters are more motivated to vote for Kamala Harris once they hear contrast...
10 ways Project 2025 could make your job worse
Sep. 24 / Fast Company / Daily Kos's podcast captures a lively political discourse, touching on Project 2025's ongoing relevance. It provides a unique audio format that engages listeners with current political dynamics. “ In late August, Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance told a crowd of union firefighters that he and his running mate, Donald Trump, are “the most...
California House Democrats seek to tie Trump to conservatives' controversial Project 2025
Sep. 24 / L.a. Times / California House Democrats aim to expose the detrimental effects of Project 2025 through a public hearing. This proactive approach highlights a strategic effort to connect Trump with unpopular policies. “ California House Democrats — seeking to connect former President Trump to the ultra-conservative policy blueprint Project 2025 — will hold a public hearing...
JD Vance Fundraises with Woman Tied to Project 2025 as Trump Distances Himself
Sep. 25 / Newsweek / Vance's fundraising ties to Project 2025 illustrate the ongoing influence of its policies despite Trump's distancing. It highlights the tension between candidates and the broader implications for reproductive rights. “ Ohio Senator and vice-presidential nominee attended a fundraiser with one of Project 2025's key backers Tuesday, despite former president . Brooke Rollins,...
Project 2025 is less popular than socialism: poll
Sep. 23 / Raw Story / Fast Company outlines ten ways Project 2025 could harm workers, contrasting public Republican rhetoric with proposed anti-worker policies. It provides expert insights that highlight the potential damage to labor rights. “ The guide for Donald Trump's second administration published by The Heritage Foundation has garnered so much negative attention and backlash that it is now...
Project 2025 is a huge blunder from Trump’s allies
Sep. 23 / The Washington Post / The Washington Post underscores the unpopularity of Project 2025, using polling data to illustrate its potential impact on Trump’s campaign. It effectively contextualizes the plan as a liability for the GOP. “ There is vanishingly little doubt that Project 2025 has become one of the most unpopular political programs or ideas in recent history. The question is...