Nathan Wade subpoenaed by House Republicans after avoiding service

The House Judiciary Committee, led by Chairman Jim Jordan, sought to question Wade regarding his past romantic relationship with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who is overseeing the prosecution of Trump on charges related to the 2020 election. Wade had initially agreed to a voluntary interview but later canceled, prompting the committee to issue a subpoena. Despite confirming receipt of the subpoena on the day of the scheduled deposition, Wade did not appear, leading to concerns about his compliance with the request. After days of attempts to serve him, Wade contacted the committee to accept the subpoena once he learned of the Marshals’ involvement. The committee’s investigation is focused on potential misuse of taxpayer funds in the context of the politically charged prosecution.

Background on Nathan Wade and the Investigation

• Professional Background: Nathan Wade was hired by Willis to lead the prosecution against Trump but resigned in March following revelations of their romantic relationship.
• Subpoena Context: The House Judiciary Committee’s interest in Wade stems from allegations of politically motivated prosecution and the financial aspects of his billing during his tenure with the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office.
• Legal Implications: Wade’s relationship with Willis raises questions about potential conflicts of interest in the prosecution, which is currently under scrutiny by the Georgia Court of Appeals.

Current Status

• Subpoena Served: Wade has now been served the subpoena, but it remains unclear when he will testify before the committee.
• Political Reactions: Wade’s attorney characterized the subpoena as political theater, highlighting the contentious nature of the investigation amidst the upcoming presidential election.

This unfolding situation underscores the complex interplay of legal and political dynamics in high-profile cases involving former President Trump and his associates.