Summary
The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times faced significant backlash after their owners decided not to endorse any presidential candidates for the upcoming election. This unprecedented move, which diverged from decades of editorial practice, resulted in a wave of subscription cancellations and resignations from editorial board members, highlighting deep divisions within the publications and among their readership.
Both newspapers were reportedly prepared to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris, but their owners intervened, leading to a decision that critics have described as a failure to take a stand against the perceived threat of authoritarianism posed by former President Donald Trump. Following the announcement, The Washington Post experienced over 250,000 cancellations, roughly 10% of its subscriber base, while resignations from editorial staff further underscored the internal conflict regarding the decision. Critics, including former editors and journalists, characterized the non-endorsement as a sign of weakness and a betrayal of journalistic integrity, arguing that it undermines the role of the press in holding power accountable.
Reasons for Non-Endorsement
Jeff Bezos, the owner of The Washington Post, defended the decision in an opinion piece, asserting that endorsements do not significantly influence voter behavior and instead create a perception of bias. He emphasized the need for the media to rebuild trust with the public, particularly in a climate of widespread skepticism towards journalism. Similarly, Patrick Soon-Shiong, owner of the Los Angeles Times, cited the goal of reducing division as a reason for the decision.
Impact on Subscriptions and Staff
The fallout from the non-endorsement was immediate, with reports indicating that more than 200,000 subscribers canceled their digital subscriptions to The Washington Post shortly after the announcement. This loss represents a significant financial blow to the newspaper, which relies heavily on its subscription model. In addition, resignations from the editorial board and vocal dissatisfaction from staff members reflected a broader crisis of confidence in the newspaper’s leadership and direction.
Public Reaction
Public response to the decision has been polarized. While some readers supported the idea that newspapers should refrain from endorsements to maintain impartiality, a substantial portion of the audience expressed outrage, feeling that the newspapers failed to uphold their responsibility to challenge authoritarian figures. Surveys indicated that a majority of Americans believe newspapers should endorse candidates, highlighting a disconnect between the decisions made by the newspapers’ owners and the expectations of their readership.
Conclusion
The non-endorsement decisions by The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times have ignited a significant debate about the role of journalism in democracy, the responsibilities of media organizations, and the challenges they face in maintaining credibility among a skeptical public. As the election approaches, both newspapers must navigate the complex landscape of public opinion and internal dissent while striving to fulfill their journalistic mission.
Most Americans Do Not Think Newspapers Should Endorse Political Candidates
Oct. 31 / Newsweek / Analyzes public sentiment regarding newspaper endorsements, revealing a surprising disconnect between the general public's views and the decisions made by the Washington Post and LA Times. The poll data enriches the discussion. “ More Americans believe newspapers should not endorse political candidates than those who think they should, according to a poll conducted by YouGov on...
2024 has fewer polls, but they are higher quality
Oct. 28 / Abc News / Explores the quality of polling in 2024, noting fewer but more reliable polls compared to previous cycles. The analysis reassures readers about the accuracy of current polling despite some declines. “ As Election Day approaches, many of you may find yourselves obsessively checking the polls , poring over every minute change in our forecasts and averages to...
Oct. 28 / Cnn / Highlights the wave of cancellations and resignations at the Washington Post, providing a clear overview of the fallout. CNN's authoritative voice lends credibility, though it lacks deeper analysis of the implications. “ So long to all that “free” money. Customers who allegedly withdrew money fraudulently from Chase Bank ATMs using an illegal scheme that blew up on TikTok...
Washington Post cancellations hit 250,000 – 10% of subscribers
Oct. 29 / The Guardian / Describes the turmoil at the Washington Post post-decision, emphasizing the resignations and reader backlash. The emotional resonance is palpable, though it could benefit from a broader context on media trust. “ Reader backlash against decision not to make presidential endorsement rolls on despite Bezos defense of decision
Jeff Bezos defends Washington Post's decision to end endorsements
Oct. 29 / Cbs News / Reports on the internal chaos at the Washington Post, emphasizing the resignations and subscriber losses. The narrative effectively captures the emotional stakes, though it may lack a broader industry perspective. “ Jeff Bezos on Monday defended the Washington Post's decision not to endorse a presidential candidate as "principled," with the billionaire founder of...
Jeff Bezos defends Washington Post's decision to end endorsements
Oct. 29 / Cbs News / Bezos's rationale for the non-endorsement is presented clearly, emphasizing the need for impartiality in journalism. However, the article could benefit from a more critical examination of the backlash. “ Jeff Bezos on Monday defended the Washington Post's decision not to endorse a presidential candidate as "principled," with the billionaire founder of...
Owner Jeff Bezos defends Washington Post's decision not to endorse a presidential candidate
Oct. 29 / Wcpo / Billionaire Jeff Bezos articulates a defense of the Washington Post's non-endorsement decision, framing it as a principled stance against perceived media bias. His insights into internal dissent add depth. “ Billionaire Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos on Monday defended the newspaper's decision not to endorse a presidential candidate as “right” and “principled”...
New poll shows neck-and-neck Senate race in unexpected ruby red state
Oct. 28 / Masslive / Discusses the implications of the non-endorsement decision, linking it to broader issues of media credibility and accountability. The analysis is concise and relevant but may lack a detailed historical context. “ With just over a week before Election Day, a U.S. Senate race in Nebraska is heating up, according to a new New York Times/Siena poll. Incumbent Republican...
What Burned Ballots in Oregon, Washington Mean for Toss-Up House Races
Oct. 28 / Newsweek / Discusses ballot damage from arson incidents in Oregon and Washington, framing the events within competitive House races. The piece highlights the implications for voter turnout and election integrity. “ Votes cast in two toss-up House races have been damaged after ballot drop boxes were set on fire in Portland, Oregon, and neighboring Vancouver, Washington....
Trump proposes eliminating personal income taxes. How would that work?
Oct. 28 / Abc News / Covers the significant backlash against Bezos's decision, linking it to a broader media credibility crisis. The piece is concise and informative, but it could explore the historical context of the decision further. “ In recent campaign speeches, former President Donald Trump has repeatedly floated an eye-catching idea: the elimination of individual income taxes. The...
US cements rule to ban high-tech exports to China
Oct. 28 / The Hill / Examines Jeff Bezos's rationale behind the non-endorsement, presenting his arguments against bias in media. The piece is straightforward but may lack deeper exploration of the implications for journalistic integrity. “ The Treasury Department cemented a final rule on Monday that prevents those in the United States from exporting certain technologies to China that could...
Oct. 28 / Pr Newswire / Reports on the subscriber losses at the Washington Post, quantifying the impact of the non-endorsement decision. This statistical focus provides clarity but could delve deeper into the emotional fallout. “ NEW YORK , Oct. 28, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Report on how AI is driving market transformation - The global rifles market size is estimated to grow by USD 766.5...
200,000 People Unsubscribed From Washington Post Following Decision To Not Endorse, Report Says
Oct. 28 / Forbes / Quantifies the fallout from the non-endorsement decision, effectively illustrating the scale of subscriber losses. The article captures the financial implications but could delve deeper into the emotional responses. “ Topline In the wake of billionaire owner Jeff Bezos’ decision to block The Washington Post from endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris last week, 200,000...
L.A. Times, Washington Post see subscription cancellations over not endorsing in presidential race
Oct. 29 / L.a. Times / Focuses on the significant backlash against Bezos's defense of the non-endorsement, capturing the frustration of staff and readers alike. The piece effectively conveys the sense of urgency surrounding the decision. “ The Los Angeles Times and Washington Post have seen significant subscription cancellations in the days since their billionaire owners decided not to endorse...
Jeff Bezos breaks silence on decision to drop Washington Post presidential endorsements
Oct. 29 / Kron4 / Examines Bezos's rationale for the non-endorsement, presenting his defense in a straightforward manner. It captures the growing dissent among staff and the potential long-term repercussions for the Post. “ Jeff Bezos, the billionaire founder of Amazon and owner of The Washington Post, broke his silence late Monday in the face of an intensifying controversy over...