Beta

HEADLINES

New Georgia Election Rule Allows Exclusion of Precincts from Vote Totals, Potentially Impacting 2024 Presidential Race

Summary

A new election rule in Georgia, passed by the state’s Republican-controlled election board, allows local officials to exclude entire precincts from vote totals under the guise of investigating irregularities. This rule could significantly impact the outcome of the 2024 presidential race by enabling partisan officials to challenge and potentially disregard votes from Democratic-leaning precincts, raising concerns about election integrity and voter disenfranchisement.

The rule, which has been backed by groups aligned with former President Donald Trump, gives county election boards broad authority to investigate discrepancies between the number of ballots cast and the number of voters recorded. This power could lead to the exclusion of votes from specific precincts, particularly in rural counties where Democratic votes are concentrated. An analysis indicates that even a small number of excluded precincts could tip the election results, as seen in the 2020 race where Trump lost Georgia by fewer than 12,000 votes. Critics argue that the vagueness of the rule and the partisan makeup of local election boards could result in selective enforcement, disproportionately affecting voters in Democratic-heavy areas.

Implications of the New Rule

  • Exclusion of Votes: The rule allows county boards to investigate and potentially exclude votes from precincts where discrepancies are found, which could be leveraged to disenfranchise voters.

  • Partisan Control: Many local election boards have been restructured to include members who support Trump’s claims of election fraud, leading to fears that these boards will act in a partisan manner.

  • Legal Challenges: The legality of the new rule is currently being debated in court, with multiple lawsuits filed by both Democratic and Republican entities seeking to challenge its implementation. The outcomes of these legal battles could have significant ramifications for the electoral process in Georgia.

Historical Context

This rule is part of a broader trend in Georgia and other states where election laws have been revised following the 2020 presidential election. The changes, often justified by claims of widespread voter fraud, have led to increased scrutiny of election procedures and raised alarms about the potential for chaos and confusion during the upcoming elections. As the 2024 presidential race approaches, the implications of these rule changes continue to unfold, with advocates for voting rights mobilizing to counteract potential disenfranchisement.

Letter: The emperor has no clothes (6/10)

/ Bangor Daily News  Letters submitted by BDN readers are verified by BDN Opinion Page staff. Send your letters to letters@bangordailynews.com Donald Trump won the 2020 election....

A handful of rural Georgia counties could exclude enough votes to affect the 2024 race (8/10)

/ Raw Story / An insightful examination of Georgia's election rule changes, highlighting how a few rural counties could influence the presidential race. It combines detailed analysis with specific examples of local officials' biases.  An examination of a new election rule in Georgia passed by the state’s Republican-controlled election board suggests that local officials in just a handful...

New rule could allow election skeptics on Georgia county election boards to exclude decisive votes (7.5/10)

/ Salon / A thorough analysis of the new election rules, detailing the partisan reshaping of local boards. It provides a rich context of the political landscape and the potential impact on voter disenfranchisement.  -- Shares Facebook Twitter Reddit Email This article originally appeared on ProPublica . ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign...

Even Republicans alarmed by new Georgia election rules — but experts worry "nothing will be done" (7/10)

/ Salon / A critical perspective from within Republican circles, emphasizing concerns over new election rules. It explores the potential for chaos and highlights the challenges of enforcing clarity before the election.  -- Shares Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Even Republicans are ringing alarm bells about the last-minute changes Georgia’s State Election Board is making to...

Pro-Trump Georgia election board weighs new rules as critics warn of chaos - The Washington Post (6.5/10)

/ Google News / A succinct overview of the chaos surrounding Georgia's election board changes, drawing on multiple sources. It effectively captures the broader implications of these changes while remaining accessible to readers.  Pro-Trump Georgia election board weighs new rules as critics warn of chaos The Washington PostGeorgia election rule changes by Trump allies raise fear of...

Trump’s false voter fraud claims set stage for turmoil — again (7/10)

/ Al Jazeera / A compelling look at Trump's rhetoric around voter fraud and its consequences. It connects historical claims to current election dynamics, emphasizing the risks of misinformation and its impact on voting access.  Trump's false voter fraud claims set stage for turmoil — again Donald Trump has gone back to the same message , time and time again, as he criss-crosses the...