Summary
Vice President Kamala Harris’s recent call to eliminate the Senate filibuster in order to codify abortion rights has resulted in significant backlash, particularly from Senator Joe Manchin, who has publicly withdrawn his endorsement of her presidential campaign. Manchin, an independent who previously identified as a Democrat, criticized Harris’s proposal as detrimental to bipartisan cooperation in the Senate, stating that it would transform the legislative body into a more partisan arena akin to the House of Representatives.
Harris’s comments came during an interview on Wisconsin Public Radio, where she advocated for a filibuster carve-out to allow a simple majority vote for legislation protecting reproductive rights, specifically to restore the protections of Roe v. Wade following its overturning by the Supreme Court in 2022. Manchin responded emphatically, labeling her stance as “shortsighted” and emphasizing the filibuster’s role as a crucial mechanism for fostering dialogue and compromise among senators. He expressed concern that eliminating the filibuster would lead to a cycle of unstable legislation that could be easily reversed by future majorities, undermining the legislative process. Senator Kyrsten Sinema, another independent senator, echoed Manchin’s sentiments, arguing that such a move could enable future Congresses to enact sweeping restrictions on abortion rights.
Context of the Filibuster Debate
The filibuster has long been a contentious issue in the U.S. Senate, requiring a supermajority of 60 votes to close debate on most legislation. While it has been weakened in the context of judicial nominations, its potential removal for legislative matters raises fears among some lawmakers about increased partisanship and instability. Harris’s position reflects a broader Democratic effort to secure reproductive rights in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision, but it risks fracturing the party, especially with key moderates like Manchin and Sinema expressing strong opposition.
Implications for Harris’s Campaign
This withdrawal of support from Manchin is particularly significant given his influence as a centrist voice in the Senate. Both he and Sinema have indicated they will not seek reelection, which may embolden their critiques of party leadership as they navigate their final months in office. Harris’s push to eliminate the filibuster may be seen as a strategic gamble to solidify her stance on abortion rights, but the immediate fallout could hinder her campaign’s momentum, especially as she faces a challenging electoral landscape against former President Donald Trump.
How Trump won the White House (again): These key issues propelled election win
Nov. 6 / Usa Today / Insightful analysis of the political fallout for Harris, emphasizing her electoral challenges. It articulates the broader implications of her filibuster comments, making it a valuable resource for understanding current dynamics. “ WASHINGTON - Donald Trump , a defeated president in 2020 and a convicted felon in 2024, r eclaimed the White House with a one-of-a-kind campaign that relied...
Sep. 25 / Benzinga / Examines Manchin's refusal to endorse Harris in light of her comments, providing insights into his motivations. The article is concise yet informative, making it a solid choice for readers interested in political dynamics. “ Democratic Party candidate Kamala Harris may be riding on the high of the strong impact she has created among voters ever since she replaced President Joe...
Kamala Harris Blasted by Manchin, Sinema on Filibuster Plan: 'Shame on Her'
Sep. 24 / Newsweek / Focuses on the political ramifications of Harris's comments, particularly regarding her campaign. The piece offers a balanced view, weighing both the support for abortion rights and the risks of partisanship. “ Vice President faces pushback from two independent U.S. senators after saying that she supports ending the filibuster, hoping the measure would help restore...
Sep. 24 / Google News / Offers a clear account of Manchin's stance against Harris's proposal, framing it as a pivotal moment in the ongoing filibuster debate. The article is well-written, providing a coherent narrative for readers to engage with. “ Manchin Won’t Endorse Harris After Her Call to End Filibuster Over Abortion Rights The New York TimesKamala Harris tells WPR she supports eliminating the...
Manchin not endorsing Harris after she calls for abortion filibuster carve-out: ‘Shame on her’
Sep. 24 / Gazette / Covers the immediate fallout from Harris's comments, emphasizing Manchin's withdrawal of support. The article does well in detailing the reactions from both sides, enhancing the reader's understanding of the stakes. “ Vice President Kamala Harris‘s vow to create a carve-out for the filibuster to pass abortion legislation has cost her support from Sen. Joe Manchin (I-WV)....
Manchin, Sinema pan Harris over call to scrap filibuster
Sep. 24 / Kron4 / Details the criticisms from Manchin and Sinema, showcasing the potential for intra-party conflict. The article effectively underscores the significance of the filibuster in maintaining Senate decorum. “ Sens. Joe Manchin (I-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) sharply criticized Vice President Harris after she said on Tuesday that she wants to scrap the...
Kamala Harris wants to end filibuster to push Roe v Wade abortion rights through Congress
Sep. 24 / New York Post / Explores the potential consequences of Harris's proposal, framing it as a significant political gamble. The article effectively discusses the historical context of the filibuster, adding layers to the debate. “ Vice President Kamala Harris said Tuesday she wants to gut the Senate’s 60-vote legislative filibuster to push legislation codifying Roe v. Wade through...
Harris backs eliminating filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade
Sep. 24 / Axios / Brings clarity to Harris's stance on the filibuster, emphasizing her aim to codify Roe v. Wade. The piece effectively contextualizes her comments within the broader abortion rights debate, making it relevant. “ Vice President Harris told Wisconsin Public Radio that she supports eliminating the Senate filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade. Why it matters: Harris' comments...
Harris says she would support ending the filibuster to bring back Roe v. Wade - NPR
Sep. 24 / Google News / Offers a succinct summary of Harris's support for ending the filibuster, highlighting its implications. The article is straightforward and informative, making it accessible for readers seeking quick insights. “ Harris says she would support ending the filibuster to bring back Roe v. Wade NPRHarris backs eliminating filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade AxiosKamala Harris...
‘Shame on her’: Manchin reacts to Harris' vow to gut fillibuster to codify abortion rights - CNN
Sep. 24 / Google News / Manchin's strong condemnation of Harris's filibuster stance is compellingly detailed, providing crucial context to the ongoing debate. The article effectively captures the emotional weight of his response, enhancing reader engagement. “ ‘Shame on her’: Manchin reacts to Harris' vow to gut fillibuster to codify abortion rights CNNKamala Harris tells WPR she supports eliminating the filibuster...
Sep. 24 / Dailycaller / Presents a strong critique of Harris's proposal through Manchin's perspective, effectively capturing the emotional weight of his response. The use of direct quotes adds depth to the analysis of the political fallout. “ Vice President Kamala Harris on Tuesday expressed support for ending the Senate’s filibuster rule in order to pass legislation codifying “abortion rights,”...
Kamala’s Threat to Eliminate Filibuster Backfires as Manchin, Sinema Turn Against Her
Sep. 24 / Brietbart / Highlights the backlash from Manchin and Sinema, providing a clear narrative on the divisions within the Democratic Party. The article is well-structured, making it easy to follow the key arguments against Harris's position. “ Two pro-abortion rights Senators turned on Vice President and Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris over her call to end the filibuster to codify...