Families seek recognition of "blood money" compensation for victims of violence by AU and troop-contributing nations in Somalia.

The concept of “blood money” is deeply rooted in Somali culture, serving as a form of compensation for wrongful deaths. Following the killings of civilians by AU forces, such as the Golweyn massacre, families have sought financial reparations to address their loss and suffering. Despite the AU’s acknowledgment of the need for accountability, families report a lack of concrete action, with many feeling betrayed by both the AU and their own government. The withdrawal of AU forces from Somalia, planned for the end of the year, raises further concerns about the future of accountability and the potential establishment of a new mission, which may struggle to gain the trust of local communities if past grievances remain unaddressed.

Historical Context of AU Involvement

Since the AU’s deployment in Somalia in 2007, aimed at countering the al-Shabab insurgency, there have been numerous reports of civilian casualties resulting from peacekeeper operations. The transition to the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS) in 2022 did not alter the ongoing issues of accountability for civilian harm. Families of victims have consistently called for “blood money” payments, a culturally significant form of compensation, yet these requests have often gone unfulfilled.

Legal and Cultural Implications

The call for blood money is not merely a financial demand but is intertwined with Somali cultural practices that emphasize restitution for loss of life. This practice has historical significance, serving as a means to resolve conflicts and restore social harmony. However, the legal framework surrounding peacekeeping operations often grants immunity to troops, complicating efforts to hold them accountable for violence against civilians. The lack of a clear mechanism for addressing such grievances has left many families feeling marginalized and without recourse.

The Role of International Bodies

International bodies, including the AU and the United Nations, have recognized the importance of accountability and compensation. However, the implementation of these principles has been inconsistent. Reports of abuses by peacekeepers have prompted calls for reform and better oversight, yet the mechanisms in place often fall short of delivering justice or reparations to affected families. The situation underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to peacekeeping that includes robust accountability measures to foster trust and cooperation with local communities.