Republican efforts to introduce proof-of-citizenship requirements for voting

The recent law in New Hampshire, signed by Governor Chris Sununu, will not take effect until after the 2024 elections but has already sparked significant backlash from various groups, including youth activists and the ACLU. Opponents argue that such laws create unnecessary barriers to voting and can disenfranchise eligible voters. The ACLU has filed a lawsuit against the law, claiming it imposes some of the most restrictive voting measures in the country, while youth activists have expressed their intent to challenge the legislation on the grounds that it will complicate voter registration efforts. These developments reflect ongoing tensions surrounding voting rights and election security, with Republicans advocating for stricter measures while critics warn of the potential impact on voter participation.

Legislative Context

• New Hampshire’s HB 1569: Signed into law on September 12, 2024, this legislation requires proof of citizenship and a photo ID for voting, which will take effect after the upcoming elections. Currently, New Hampshire allows voters to sign an affidavit to attest to their identity.

• Proposed SAVE Act: This federal legislation aims to require proof of citizenship for voter registration across the U.S. Although it has faced resistance, it reflects a concerted effort by some Republicans to implement similar voting laws at the national level.

Opposition and Legal Challenges

• Youth Activist Response: The New Hampshire Youth Movement has filed a lawsuit against the new law, claiming it will cause confusion and extra work for voter registration efforts. They have labeled the legislation as a “right wing voter fraud conspiracy.”

• ACLU Lawsuit: The ACLU has joined forces with various organizations to challenge the law, arguing that it threatens to disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters. They assert that such laws create unconstitutional barriers to voting.

These ongoing legislative and legal battles highlight the contentious nature of voting rights in the U.S., as states navigate the balance between election integrity and access to the ballot.