Summary
The tax plans proposed by former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are projected to significantly impact the U.S. national debt over the next decade. Trump’s policies are estimated to add approximately $7.5 trillion to the debt, while Harris’s proposals could increase it by around $3.5 trillion. These projections raise concerns about the sustainability of fiscal policy and the potential for a fiscal crisis if neither candidate addresses the growing debt effectively.
Both candidates have outlined ambitious economic agendas that include tax cuts and spending initiatives aimed at stimulating growth and addressing economic inequality. Trump aims to extend the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which would maintain lower corporate tax rates and eliminate taxes on tips and Social Security benefits, while proposing tariffs to generate revenue. Harris, on the other hand, plans to raise corporate taxes and implement new tax credits for families, with a focus on supporting middle-class Americans. However, both plans are criticized for lacking comprehensive strategies to manage the rising national debt, which is already at historically high levels.
Projected Costs of Tax Plans
- Trump’s Plan:
- Estimated to add $7.5 trillion to the national debt.
- Proposes extending the corporate tax cut from 21% to 15% for U.S.-based manufacturers and eliminating taxes on tips and overtime pay.
- Plans to fund initiatives through tariffs on imports, which he argues will not increase inflation.
- Harris’s Plan:
- Expected to increase the national debt by $3.5 trillion.
- Proposes raising the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28% and expanding tax credits for families, particularly through a revamped Child Tax Credit.
- Aims to offset costs with increased taxes on high earners and corporations.
Implications for National Debt
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has highlighted that neither candidate’s plan sufficiently addresses the long-term implications for the national debt. Under current projections, the public debt could rise to 142% of GDP if Trump is elected, while Harris’s policies could push it to 133%. Both candidates face the challenge of balancing their ambitious fiscal initiatives with the need to maintain fiscal responsibility, as failure to do so could lead to significant economic repercussions.
Conclusion
As the election approaches, the contrasting tax plans of Trump and Harris underscore a broader debate about fiscal policy, economic growth, and the sustainability of national debt. Voters will need to consider the implications of each candidate’s proposals not only for immediate economic relief but also for the long-term health of the U.S. economy.
Trump tax plan is shift from decadeslong GOP quest to broaden base
Oct. 28 / Gazette / Discusses the shift in Trump's tax strategy, moving away from traditional Republican principles. It highlights how his proposals target specific voter groups, offering a unique perspective on electoral strategy. “ Former President Donald Trump’s new tax proposals targeting specific subsets of voters are a policy reversal from the long-sought Republican goal of...
How Trump or Harris would drive the deficit higher
Oct. 7 / Axios / Covers the projected deficits from both candidates' plans, with a strong focus on the long-term implications for public debt. The analysis is straightforward and emphasizes the urgency for fiscal reform. “ Data: Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget; Chart: Axios VisualsBoth presidential candidates' agendas would add trillions to already-enormous U.S....
Your wallet, your vote: The essential economy voter guide for 2024
Oct. 8 / Nj / Explores the broader economic concerns of voters, linking them to candidates' tax policies. It effectively contextualizes the election's economic stakes, though it lacks specific details on candidates' plans. “ What’s the issue? The U.S. has the largest economy in the history of the modern world. Precisely: $28 trillion. That’s twenty-eight-thousand billion dollars...
Trump's plan would add $4 trillion more to U.S. debt compared to Harris', analysis says
Oct. 7 / Npr / Presents a clear breakdown of how Trump's tax plan could exacerbate national debt compared to Harris's. It effectively warns of a potential fiscal crisis while providing useful context for voters. “ With less than a month left until Election Day, both the Harris and Trump campaigns have presented their economic visions to the American people — including...
Kamala Harris' plan to raise taxes on corporations and the wealthy
Oct. 7 / The Week / Offers a detailed analysis of Kamala Harris's tax plans, emphasizing her focus on tax credits and support for low-income families. The article effectively contrasts her approach with Trump's, providing clarity on fiscal implications. “ Tax policy is an area that tends to invite highly specific ideas during U.S. presidential campaigns, as virtually all Americans are forced to reckon with the...
Trump vs. Harris: Who Will Rack Up Most Debt for the US?
Oct. 7 / Newsweek / Highlights the projected impacts of both candidates on national debt, backed by analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. The article succinctly compares the financial ramifications of their policies. “ Neither Vice President nor former President has put forward a plan to address the rising debt burden, according to a report released today from the . The...
A look at Donald Trump's no-tax pledges and their cost
Oct. 7 / Apnews / Examines Trump's tax proposals in depth, revealing potential costs and implications for the national budget. The piece raises critical questions about funding and the sustainability of his policies. “ Donald Trump has pledged to end taxes on everything from tips to Social Security and overtime pay if he’s elected to the White House again. But he hasn’t...
Trump Lays Out New Economic Plan as Harris Closes Gap
Oct. 1 / Newsweek / Analyzes Trump's economic plan and its focus on tariffs and corporate tax cuts. It provides insight into his strategy to revive American manufacturing but lacks a deep exploration of fiscal consequences. “ Former President set out plans he said would bring back jobs from abroad to American industry and reward hard-working Americans in an opinion column in ahead...