Comparative analysis of Esmail Qaani's leadership style and strategies in contrast to Qassem Soleimani's legacy

Esmail Qaani’s leadership of Iran’s Quds Force marks a distinct shift from the legacy of his predecessor, Qassem Soleimani. While Soleimani was known for his charismatic and high-profile approach, Qaani appears to adopt a more reserved style, focusing on maintaining operational continuity and influence within Iran’s regional alliances, particularly in the context of ongoing tensions involving Israel and Hezbollah.

Qaani became the head of the Quds Force following the assassination of Soleimani in 2020, inheriting a complex web of military and intelligence operations across the Middle East. His leadership has been characterized by a commitment to the established strategies of the Quds Force, emphasizing the importance of regional allies and proxy groups. For instance, recent reports indicate that Qaani was active in Beirut during Israeli strikes aimed at Hezbollah, showcasing his role in regional military dynamics despite his low public profile compared to Soleimani’s.

Leadership Style

• Charisma vs. Stealth: Soleimani was often seen as a charismatic figure who engaged in high-profile diplomacy and military operations, which earned him significant public recognition. In contrast, Qaani’s approach is more understated, focusing on behind-the-scenes management and operational effectiveness rather than personal visibility.

• Public Engagement: Soleimani frequently appeared in media and public events, reinforcing his image as a national hero. Qaani, however, has maintained a lower profile, with recent communications conveyed through deputies, as seen when his deputy confirmed Qaani’s good health after concerns arose about his absence during critical military operations.

Strategic Continuity

• Focus on Proxy Forces: Both leaders share a commitment to using proxy forces to extend Iran’s influence. Soleimani was instrumental in shaping Iran’s relationships with groups like Hezbollah, while Qaani continues this strategy, evidenced by his reported presence in Lebanon during heightened military activity.

• Response to Threats: Qaani’s leadership is tested by ongoing Israeli operations against Iranian interests in the region. His ability to navigate these threats while ensuring the operational readiness of the Quds Force reflects a strategic continuity from Soleimani’s era, although the methods and public narrative may differ.

Conclusion

In summary, while Esmail Qaani continues the strategic framework established by Qassem Soleimani, his leadership style diverges significantly, favoring a more discreet and operationally focused approach. This evolution reflects both the changing geopolitical landscape and the need for Iran to adapt its military strategies in response to external pressures, particularly from Israel and its regional adversaries.